منابع مشابه
Introduction to Judgment Aggregation
The present notes are an improved version of the notes that served as teaching materials for the course Introduction to Judgment Aggregation given at the 23rd European Summer School on Logic, Language and Information (ESSLLI’11, Ljubljana). The notes are structured as follows: Section 1 introduces the field of judgment aggregation, its relations to preference aggregation and some formal prelimi...
متن کاملIntroduction to judgment aggregation
This introduces the symposium on judgment aggregation. The theory of judgment aggregation asks how several individualsjudgments on some logically connected propositions can be aggregated into consistent collective judgments. The aim of this introduction is to show how ideas from the familiar theory of preference aggregation can be extended to this more general case. We rst translate a proof o...
متن کاملand Ben Polak Introduction to judgment aggregation
This introduces the symposium on judgment aggregation. The theory of judgment aggregation asks how several individualsjudgments on some logically connected propositions can be aggregated into consistent collective judgments. The aim of this introduction is to show how ideas from the familiar theory of preference aggregation can be extended to this more general case. We rst translate a proof o...
متن کاملJudgment aggregation: a short introduction
s from the speci c decision problem and aggregation rule in question. My exposition of this model follows the formalism introduced in List and Pettit (2002) and extended beyond standard propositional logic by Dietrich (2007a). There is a nite set of (two or more) individuals, who have to make judgments on some propositions.3 Propositions are represented by sentences from propositional logic or...
متن کاملJudgment Aggregation
Judgment aggregation theory generalizes social choice theory by having the aggregation rule bear on judgments of all kinds instead of barely judgments of preference. The paper briefly sums it up, privileging the variant that formalizes judgment by a logical syntax. The theory derives from Kornhauser and Sager’s doctrinal paradox and Pettit’s discursive dilemma, which List and Pettit turned into...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Economic Theory
سال: 2010
ISSN: 0022-0531
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2010.02.001